act

How actors learn lines by heart

The Italian run, the memory palace, walking while running lines. Old rehearsal room habits, and what memory research says about them.

By Léo Rousselière · · 7 min read

Rehearsal rooms have been solving the memory problem for centuries. They did it without a single study, without a word of neuroscience, and mostly without writing anything down.

Laboratories arrived later. When they did, they found that a lot of what companies had been doing all along was, in fact, exactly right.

This article puts the two side by side. Not to crown a method: there isn't one, and every actor ends up building their own.

Why lines disappear so fast after you learn them

Forgetting starts within hours, not days. The work published by Hermann Ebbinghaus in 1885 showed that roughly half of freshly learned material is gone within a day, and close to 80 % within two. That is not a memory defect. That is memory working normally.

Ebbinghaus experimented on himself. To stop meaning from skewing his measurements, he built around 2,300 syllables that meant nothing at all. MUK. GOP. JEB. He then tested his recall over spans running from twenty minutes to thirty days.

A play is obviously not a list of nonsense syllables. It has meaning, logic, rhythm, and all of that helps enormously. The underlying mechanism holds anyway. What is not revisited fades, and it fades quickly.

Which explains something every actor has lived through. Word-perfect at eleven at night, and gaps in the morning where there were none.

What an Italian run actually does to memory

An Italian run is a rehearsal where the text is delivered with no acting, no intention, no movement, usually sitting down, and at a speed well beyond the show. TDF's Theatre Dictionary defines it as a speed-through, and notes it also travels under two other names: Italian rehearsal, or Russian run.

Actors who meet it for the first time tend to dislike it. It looks like mechanical drilling. It is doing several things at once.

It isolates the words from everything else. As long as you rehearse while acting, it becomes hard to tell whether you hold the text or whether emotion is quietly retrieving it for you. The Italian run removes that crutch.

It works the joins more than the lines. Companies often sit in a line and run their dialogue at double time, which pushes attention onto the handovers between characters rather than onto each part taken alone. And gaps, in performance, almost always land on a handover. It is also what disappears when you work on your lines alone, without a scene partner.

It manufactures speed. A text that comes out fast is a text that is available. One that needs a beat of searching before every line is not there yet.

Where the name comes from is unsettled. Some trace it to the influence of Italian theatre on European stages and the pace of the language. Others point to the commedia dell'arte, where performers ran their lines at speed in the wings before going on. Neither is documented with any certainty.

What happens when you add movement

Walking while running lines is one of the most widespread habits in the profession, and one of the least explained. Almost every actor does it at some point, often without deciding to, and rarely able to say what it gives them.

Several things happen at once. The movement supplies a steady rhythm the text can hang on. It occupies part of the attention, which stops the mind fixing on each word and forces it to let the line come. And it ties the text to a trajectory rather than leaving it floating.

English-language guides describe the same effect from the other direction. Attaching gestures or blocking to specific lines creates a second route to the same material, and the body tends to remember what the mind lets go.

Memory research has no clean verdict on this exact case. What is established is that active recall, meaning testing yourself and going looking for the answer, consolidates far better than passive rereading. Walking while reciting is active recall. Rereading a script sitting down is not.

Where the memory palace fits, and where it doesn't

The memory palace works by attaching what you want to hold onto a place you already know perfectly, then walking that place mentally to retrieve things in order. The technique is ancient, Roman orators used it, and it rests on a simple observation: spatial memory is far more robust than list memory.

Ebbinghaus himself named mnemonic techniques as one of two ways to improve retention, the other being active recall spaced out over time.

For actors, the value shows up on long text and on monologues, where the logic of meaning alone stops holding the order together. A chain of arguments, a speech that climbs in stages, a non-linear text: these are the cases where flat repetition runs out.

The technique also has its sceptics inside the profession. Ask working actors and a fair number will say they use raw repetition and nothing else. Some use a version of the palace without naming it, leaning on the actual set rather than an imagined room.

What research says about spacing your sessions

This is where the evidence is sharpest, and furthest from what instinct suggests. It says that a text revisited at widening intervals holds far better than one worked through in a single block, for the same total time. Instinct, meanwhile, always pushes toward doing it all at once.

Spaced repetition means revisiting a piece of material just before the point where it would be forgotten, rather than reviewing everything in one sitting. Each successful recall pushes the next forgetting further out, which is how the same material ends up needing less and less time.

Ebbinghaus set out the principle: every repetition lengthens the optimal gap before the next one. The first reviews sit a few days apart, and the intervals stretch from there.

Translated into a working calendar, four twenty-minute sessions across a week produce a more durable text than eighty minutes the night before. The total is identical. The result is not.

Which is also what makes the Italian run at the top of every rehearsal quietly devastating, without anyone having designed it that way. A company that opens each session with one has been doing spaced repetition for centuries, without knowing it.

What actors do the night before

Every guide opens by warning against leaving it to the last minute. It happens anyway, because auditions land at twenty-four hours' notice and sides arrive in the evening for the next morning. The interesting question is therefore not whether cramming is a good idea. It is what actually happens when there is no other option.

Sleep is the part most often treated as dead time, and it is the opposite. A fresh memory trace is fragile until it stabilises. It forms first in the hippocampus, which acts as a buffer, then transfers gradually to the cortex overnight. Slow-wave sleep has an established role in consolidating verbal memory.

Which is why three hours of work followed by a real night tends to beat four hours taken out of it. The fourth hour is often the least productive one anyway, run on a tired brain.

What all these techniques have in common

They all do the same thing, by different routes. They stop the work sitting in rereading. Each one forces retrieval rather than recognition, and that shift is what decides how much is still there the next morning. The differences between them are differences of route, not of principle.

The Italian run forces you to produce the text. Adding blocking brings in the body. The memory palace builds an order that does not depend on meaning. Spaced repetition makes you come back at the moment it is hard. Walking makes you retrieve rather than recognise.

The common thread has not moved since 1885. What consolidates is the effort of recall, not the time spent in front of the page.

None of which makes these techniques equivalent. A verse text is not learned like contemporary dialogue, and two days before an audition looks nothing like five weeks of rehearsal.

Sources

Follow what we publish: @join_acto on Instagram.

All articles